Commenti

Commento di SneakerXZ

10 Spell Haste Rating = 0.64%

Commento di frmorrison

This is a decent gem if you can find it cheap from a BT guild.

Just remember that as your haste increases, your mana per second goes up, as you increase your +damage your damage per mana goes up.

Both stats increase damage per second, just in different ways.

Commento di 109740

You should also remember that your own reaction time and a server lag does decrease the effect of haste rating, so with high ping or/and slow reactions you might still want to get pure damage instead.

Lag will reduce your dps pretty linearly no matter what you socket for, unless you're spamming 1.5sec casts (cos you can just whack the button on GCD).

eg. If you socket +spell damage the spell is still landing later than it would if you had haste, whether there is lag or not, so you are still losing damage because you have lost 0.1 seconds of time that you could have been using that +spell damage.

There are plenty of reasons that spell damage is better, and plenty of reasons that haste rating is better. To say that lag has anything to do with any of them is just wrong.

Commento di Spencicle

10 spell haste is roughly .1 seconds off a cast.

New Casting Time = Base Casting Time / (1 + (Spell Haste Rating/1570))

Icy Veins is about .5 seconds off a cast, so Icy Veins is roughly equal to 50 spell haste.

Commento di 82089

Given that most theorycrafters value spell haste as 1 spell damage = .90 spell haste, this gem is not better than runed crimson spinel. A simple conversion shows that the spinel is worth 10.8 spell haste, or that this gem converts to a total of 11.11 spell damage. This is a very small difference mind you, but it is a difference. You'll find a similar comparison to reckless pyrestones. This means, given a 2 socket item, putting in 2 runed spinels is approx. 1.78 spell damage more valuable than 2 of these.

If, however, your socket bonus is +2 spell damage or higher for 2 yellow sockets filled, then these become slightly better in that piece. However, reckless pyrestone is a better gem than these.

Commento di Thottbot

Alrighty, so I have this gem equipped..but no other spell haste anywhere on me. My Spell Haste in the drop down window says +10...but percentage is still 0.00%...Does anyone know how much Haste I need to show an actual percentage?

Commento di Thottbot

15.7 haste=1% so say arcane mage (me) needs 157 spell haste for 10% thus reducing arcane missile cast from 5 sec to 4.5 sec ect..
im sry but i dont know the globle CD conversion ratio I.E. how much you need to get it to 1 sec (GCD haste cap)

Commento di Thottbot

is +10 haste rating better then +12 spell damage?

Commento di Thottbot

Allright, I've recently purchased an uncut Lionseye gem from the AH. I was advertising in the Trade channel for a JewelCrafter to cut this gem into a Quick Lionseye. I got a response from a supposed JC with the recipe who told me tht Quick Lionseye is BoP. I've searched the forums and internet to determine whether this is true or not, but I've been unable to dig up any information. Does anyone know if in fact this is true? Are Quick Lionseye gems BoP and reserved for JewelCrafters only?

Commento di Thottbot

No, this gem is not BoP.

Commento di Thottbot

Just confirming that a Quick LionsEye is not BoP.

There are a few JC-only gems that are BoP and unique on top of it, but none of these gems are crafted with the epic dropped gems (or, since 2.4, bought from the new gem vendor)

Commento di Thottbot

does spell haste reduce silence time or anything else than increasing spell cast speed?

is it worth replacing spell crit gems for an arena paladin?
thx for your input

Guarda in 3D Trova miglioramenti...Collegamenti

Riassunto

Screenshot

Video

Quick Lionseye

	[Phase 5]

Livello dell’oggetto 100
+10 Spell Haste Rating

"Matches a Yellow Socket."

Prezzo di vendita: 6

Guide

Burning Crusade Classic Gems TBCC Holy Paladin Healing Best In Slot Phase 5 Gear TBCC Restoration Shaman Healing Best In Slot Phase 5 Gear

Quick Lionseye

Guide

Informazioni relative

Contribuisci